Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X7V2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X7V2  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160322
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '19 at 00:24
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4860HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 180
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 420
48% 372 Pts
64-Core 439
27% 439 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 860M
Gigabyte(1458 1756) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 915 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 11% Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 384GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 450 507 809 817 818 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 1,394
Write 747
Mixed 221
SusWrite 645
166% 752 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 20.4
90% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 488
DQ Write 445
DQ Mixed 379
309% 438 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 143%
Great: 184%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$75
237GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 95 97 97 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 49
Write 85
Mixed 53
SusWrite 95.4
52% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 68%
USB 3.0 500GB
158GB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 27.5
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 28.2
21% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3N18AES4.16FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 26.9
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 19.5
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X7V2 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X7V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback