Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime7.5 Days
Run DateMar 28 '19 at 01:54
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-6300 APU-$51
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
41.1% Average
Memory 71.1
1-Core 31.9
2-Core 67.1
39% 56.7 Pts
4-Core 67.4
8-Core 68.1
9% 67.8 Pts
64-Core 69.9
4% 69.9 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
6.04% Terrible
Lighting 7.17
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 6.78
6% 7.15 fps
MRender 6.14
Gravity 8
Splatting 8.87
6% 7.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.04%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320310CS 320GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SC14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 28 61 17 21 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 36
Write 52.7
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 31.7
27% 37.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
74% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 54%
Seagate SkyHawk 1TB (2016)-$86
678GB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 159 155 168 155 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 134
Write 149
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 153
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A 99U5584-016.A 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.5% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 5.5
15% 5.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.5
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 98.9
40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-DS2 Builds (Compare 294 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback