Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 45% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C13
Motherboard	MSI H310M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7C13) (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181123
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 01 '19 at 11:51
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	92.5% Outstanding	Memory 91.3 1-Core 121 2-Core 252 86% 155 Pts	4-Core 505 8-Core 729 77% 617 Pts	64-Core 740 46% 740 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 92.5% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3724) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 418.81 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Lighting 66.4 Reflection 68 Parallax 59.7 54% 64.7 fps	MRender 69.9 Gravity 64.2 Splatting 67.8 55% 67.3 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
CGM Virtual Disk 0001 64GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 28GB free (System drive) SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 28 28 27 29 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	19.8% Very poor	Read 38.2 Write 62.5 Mixed 82.5 SusWrite 27.5 40% 52.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 6.6 4K Mixed 4.6 783% 4.93 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 34%
CGM Virtual Disk 35606 1TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 156GB free SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 29 27 29 28 26 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	24.4% Poor	Read 54.5 Write 92.2 Mixed 51 SusWrite 27.6 42% 56.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 6.7 4K Mixed 4 710% 4.7 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 24%
CGM Virtual Disk 35862 1TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 316GB free SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	20% Poor	Read 37.8 Write 91.5 Mixed 70.5 SusWrite 29.1 43% 57.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 7.9 4K Mixed 4.9 762% 4.83 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 26%
CGM Virtual Disk 36118 1TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 931GB free SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 28 29 27 29 29 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	26.5% Poor	Read 61.8 Write 76 Mixed 76.5 SusWrite 28.5 46% 60.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 2.9 471% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB 29,586 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	MC Read 31.9 MC Write 31.1 MC Mixed 24.5 83% 29.2 GB/s	SC Read 18.7 SC Write 31.9 SC Mixed 26.3 73% 25.6 GB/s	Latency 65.3 61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 96%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x16GBUnknownBench 43%, 3,974 samples	64x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	39x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $71Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	31x

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $144