Gigabyte GA-F2A58M-DS2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A58M-DS2  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '20 at 03:05
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6400K APU-$81
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Memory 91.5
1-Core 66.8
2-Core 100
57% 86.2 Pts
4-Core 101
8-Core 101
14% 101 Pts
64-Core 97.5
6% 97.5 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8470D
AMD(1002 0123) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.48% Terrible
Lighting 4.27
Reflection 4.65
Parallax 3.59
4% 4.17 fps
MRender 4.67
Gravity 3.13
Splatting 4.83
4% 4.21 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.48%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CGM Virtual Disk 0001 64GB
27GB free (System drive)
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.3 5 4.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
3.08% Terrible
Read 5.5
Write 6
Mixed 11.7
SusWrite 4.6
5% 6.95 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
149% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.08%
Great: 34%
CGM Virtual Disk 35606 1TB
136GB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6.4 6.3 6.6 6.2 6.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.32% Terrible
Read 4.8
Write 9.5
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 6.4
6% 7.72 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
107% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.32%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Team-Elite-16 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.5% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 11
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A58M-DS2 Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A58M-DS2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $81
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback