Today's hottest deals

HP Pro 3130 Microtower PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics61% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 1 month old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Pro 3130 Microtower PC  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110318
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 18 '19 at 08:17
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core 860
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 93.8
1-Core 74.5
2-Core 152
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 363
37% 299 Pts
64-Core 349
22% 349 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61% Good
Lighting 75.7
Reflection 77.9
Parallax 68.9
62% 74.2 fps
MRender 71.6
Gravity 69.6
Splatting 75.6
60% 72.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB-$30
547GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 40 61 66 64 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 73
Write 80.7
Mixed 42
SusWrite 58.7
47% 63.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 46%
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB
177GB free
Firmware: SBFM81.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 231 230 237 237 237 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 5% Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16JTF25664AZ-1G4G1 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
42.3% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 12.9
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 13.2
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 60.2
66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro 3130 Microtower PC Builds (Compare 337 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro 3130 Microtower PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback