Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X7V2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive71.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X7V2  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160322
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 20 '19 at 07:16
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4860HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 208
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 469
54% 420 Pts
64-Core 475
29% 475 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 860M
Gigabyte(1458 1756) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 915 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 425.31
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 11% Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDAT240GB 240GB
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 541ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 146 169 147 148 154 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 300
Write 203
Mixed 209
SusWrite 152
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 92.1
4K Mixed 35.2
136% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 148
120% 169 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 71%
Mushkin MKNSSDAT240GB 240GB
166GB free
Firmware: 524ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 208 199 199 197 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80% Very good
Read 318
Write 257
Mixed 278
SusWrite 200
59% 263 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 91.3
4K Mixed 35.2
144% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 208
169% 239 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 80%
Great: 71%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 16 30 34 30 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 67.4
Write 31.1
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 28.8
27% 37 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
86% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Team-Elite-1600 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 9.9
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 11.3
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X7V2 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X7V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback