HP Pavilion Notebook

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 14%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics3.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81FE
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181116
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateMay 09 '19 at 17:46
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User BOL-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-9600P APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
11% Very poor
Memory 13
1-Core 29.5
2-Core 46.8
16% 29.8 Pts
4-Core 51.8
8-Core 52.2
7% 52 Pts
64-Core 57.3
4% 57.3 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 11%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 81FE) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.101.1701.1001
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
3.95% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 6.54
Parallax 6.22
4% 5.89 fps
MRender 4.57
Gravity 3.27
Splatting 5.91
4% 4.58 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.95%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$34
815GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX1R4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 80 70 70 66 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 33.5
Write 57.2
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 70
31% 43.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
55% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 62%
USB 3.0 super high speed 160GB
64GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 22 22 24 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 25
Write 23.7
Mixed 21
SusWrite 23.1
31% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.5% Very poor
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 6.7
15% 5.23 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4.8
12% 4.03 GB/s
Latency 377
11% 377 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Notebook Builds (Compare 8,917 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback