Samsung 550XCJ/550XCR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive40% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemSamsung 550XCJ/550XCR  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP550XCJ-KF1BR
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '23 at 18:21
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Memory 69.3
1-Core 68.4
2-Core 157
56% 98.3 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 274
32% 245 Pts
64-Core 263
16% 263 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Sanyo(144D C834) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
5.75% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 7.1
Parallax 7.1
5% 6.7 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 11.4
8% 8.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.75%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03150010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 127 120 132 122 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
40% Average
Read 286
Write 238
Mixed 133
SusWrite 123
44% 195 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 27.8
4K Mixed 20.3
42% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 122
98% 140 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 40%
Great: 91%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
683GB free
Firmware: JU003F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 131 130 131 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 137
Write 134
Mixed 49.4
SusWrite 130
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.5
189% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 77%
Great: 79%
USB 3.0 super high speed 160GB
108GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 58 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
24% Poor
Read 54.2
Write 49.1
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 57.9
66% 48.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 0194 SF4641G8CK8IEHLSBG 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
65.7% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 21.2
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 18.5
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 94.7
42% 94.7 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 23" 1280 720 SAM071E SMBX2350
Typical 550XCJ/550XCR Builds (Compare 565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 550XCJ/550XCR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback