Today's hottest deals

Asus Z77-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z77-A  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130823
Uptime7.8 Days
Run DateJun 24 '19 at 12:40
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 96.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
84% 146 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 445
58% 438 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51% Above average
Lighting 62.2
Reflection 72
Parallax 63.2
51% 65.8 fps
MRender 72.2
Gravity 63
Splatting 56.7
52% 63.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5759
Write 4,806
Mixed 4803
1,141% 5,123 MB/s
4K Read 283
4K Write 197
4K Mixed 216
810% 232 MB/s
DQ Read 828
DQ Write 759
DQ Mixed 804
601% 797 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
54GB free
Firmware: CR100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 40.5
Write 46.8
Mixed 30
SusWrite 39
29% 39.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 44%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
149GB free
Firmware: CR100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 64 64 65 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 64.5
Write 71
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 64.8
45% 60.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 44%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$52
937GB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 162 164 165 165 166 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 174
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 164
96% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
166% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
61.8% Good
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 19.5
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 20.5
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 53.5
75% 53.5 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77-A Builds (Compare 507 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus Z77-A - $144

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $525
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback