bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DQ77MK
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120504
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 30 '19 at 03:52
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$107
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 88.3
2-Core 160
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 348
39% 306 Pts
64-Core 428
26% 428 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM91.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 32 34 34 35 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 94%
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$39
420GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 85 82 83 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 134
Write 130
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 83
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
193GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 113 113 114 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 154
Write 134
Mixed 91.5
SusWrite 113
91% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
222% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 109%
Seagate Ultra Slim PL 2TB
895GB free, PID ab2e
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 107 108 108 108 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 142
Write 135
Mixed 106
SusWrite 109
164% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
107% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 52%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 113 120 120 121 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
51% Above average
Read 105
Write 118
Mixed 85
SusWrite 118
146% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.4
127% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTBJTF51264AZ-1G6E 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.7% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 14.7
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 14.6
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback