ADD TO PC
BUILD

Biostar TPower N750

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	12.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	44.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Biostar TPower N750 (all builds)
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090416
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 04 '16 at 19:22
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 53% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Memory 75.4 1-Core 53.6 2-Core 106 49% 78.5 Pts	4-Core 195 8-Core 178 25% 187 Pts	64-Core 172 11% 172 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% AMD(1002 0B37) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 21.19.137.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	12.9% Very poor	Lighting 4.17 Reflection 7.19 Parallax 3.69 3% 5.02 fps	MRender 47.3 Gravity 22.6 Splatting 43.3 31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 129GB free (System drive) Firmware: U21010RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 160 100 2976 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1121 (A6) Unknown 100 100 4706 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 4759 (A9) Unknown 100 100 36 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 4729 (AE) Unknown 100 100 432 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 63 100 240518168613 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 11403 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 158 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 974435 (F1) Unknown 253 253 4347 (F2) Unknown 253 253 9925	44.2% Average	Read 223 Write 190 Mixed 178 44% 197 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 59.6 4K Mixed 3.39 76% 29.8 MB/s	DQ Read 31.1 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 6.03 22% 46.8 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 86%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 761GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 71 (03) Spinup time 136 136 34387526053 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2007 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 121 121 34 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 23030 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2002 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2440 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2440 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 210453659685 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 35914	73.1% Very good	Read 135 Write 120 Mixed 70.8 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 1.66 4K Mixed 0.21 81% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$80 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 20GB free Firmware: CC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 99 0 (03) Spinup time 92 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 2044 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 100349 (09) Power-on hours count 55 55 40027 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2111 (B7) Unknown 98 98 2 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 30065229831 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 56 622264356 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 85 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 177 (C2) HDA temperature 36 44 94489280548 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 16 4 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 178 3587 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 109186658599561 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2480659 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3366768389	44.2% Average	Read 72.5 Write 80.2 Mixed 12.4 40% 55 MB/s	4K Read 0.24 4K Write 5.61 4K Mixed 0.31 148% 2.05 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 75%
Generic 1TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 145GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Read 35 Write 33 Mixed 13.7 33% 27.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.82 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.44 63% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	25.5% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 9.6 24% 8.53 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 7.2 18% 6.13 GB/s	Latency 89.6 45% 89.6 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback