Biostar TPower N750

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics12.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive44.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardBiostar TPower N750  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090416
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateOct 04 '16 at 19:22
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Memory 75.4
1-Core 53.6
2-Core 106
49% 78.5 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 178
25% 187 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 21.19.137.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
12.9% Very poor
Lighting 4.17
Reflection 7.19
Parallax 3.69
3% 5.02 fps
MRender 47.3
Gravity 22.6
Splatting 43.3
31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$32
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U21010RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.2% Average
Read 223
Write 190
Mixed 178
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 59.6
4K Mixed 3.39
76% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 31.1
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 6.03
22% 46.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 86%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
761GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 135
Write 120
Mixed 70.8
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.66
4K Mixed 0.21
81% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
20GB free
Firmware: CC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 72.5
Write 80.2
Mixed 12.4
40% 55 MB/s
4K Read 0.24
4K Write 5.61
4K Mixed 0.31
148% 2.05 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 75%
Generic 1TB
145GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 35
Write 33
Mixed 13.7
33% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.44
63% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
25.5% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 9.6
24% 8.53 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.2
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 89.6
45% 89.6 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback