MSI H110M PRO-VD (MS-7996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive30.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7996
MotherboardMSI H110M PRO-VD (MS-7996)  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1728 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180616
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 01 '21 at 20:14
Run Duration363 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 74.6
1-Core 90.3
2-Core 154
63% 106 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 417
39% 326 Pts
64-Core 494
30% 494 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 59%
Great: 86%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 28 106 71 9.2 60 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.1% Below average
Read 205
Write 110
Mixed 111
SusWrite 52.6
26% 120 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 23.3
4K Mixed 9.2
49% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 24.1
DQ Mixed 22.5
36% 73.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 100%
Generic 1TB
520GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 179 177 178 177 177 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 196
Write 132
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 177
192% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 2400 2OZ 8325 GLAF62F-D8---------- 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.2% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 14.2
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 9.9
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 5 101 7 60 0" 1728 1080
Typical H110M PRO-VD (MS-7996) Builds (Compare 3,535 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M PRO-VD (MS-7996) - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback