Today's hottest deals

Asus FX503VD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.98% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive99.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus FX503VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX503VD
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '19 at 11:37
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 53%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Memory 34.7
1-Core 82.7
2-Core 182
51% 99.8 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 151
27% 191 Pts
64-Core 185
12% 185 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1B90) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6374
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
5.98% Terrible
Lighting 6.73
Reflection 24.5
Parallax 4.78
6% 12 fps
MRender 5.19
Gravity 5.87
Splatting 12.6
7% 7.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.98%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid SPCC M.2 PCIe SS 256GB
213GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 391 291 290 277 294 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 962
Write 751
Mixed 542
SusWrite 330
144% 646 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 77.4
4K Mixed 22.1
94% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 396
DQ Mixed 284
216% 284 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 160%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
931GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 109 100 94 95 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 117
Write 116
Mixed 66
SusWrite 99.1
73% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 2.6
488% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
31.1% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 10
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 6
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 228
18% 228 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FX503VD Builds (Compare 1,167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus FX503VD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback