HP 550-120nc

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP 550-120nc (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 2B47
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151110
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 05 '19 at 12:30
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$170 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	Memory 82.8 1-Core 108 2-Core 204 75% 131 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 613 58% 482 Pts	64-Core 576 36% 576 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% HP(103C 2B4D) 2GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.72 Performing below potential (46^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	32.5% Below average	Lighting 42.1 Reflection 41 Parallax 36.4 34% 39.8 fps	MRender 37 Gravity 37 Splatting 32.7 29% 35.6 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 114 77 49 107 45 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Read 358 Write 364 Mixed 324 SusWrite 125 66% 293 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 47.9 4K Mixed 32.4 106% 35.3 MB/s	DQ Read 276 DQ Write 249 DQ Mixed 170 153% 232 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 88%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$72 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 424GB free Firmware: M3CR023 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 473 Write 377 Mixed 403 93% 418 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 75.4 4K Mixed 34.8 128% 46.2 MB/s	DQ Read 257 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 155 124% 177 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 649GB free Firmware: HP51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 192 190 188 189 190 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 183 Write 148 Mixed 74.5 SusWrite 189 108% 148 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 112%
Multiple Card Reader0 64GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 14GB free, PID 6479 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	7.07% Terrible	Read 25.5 Write 21.1 Mixed 22.1 SusWrite 0.6 22% 17.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 2.7 133% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.07% Great: 20%
Multiple Card Reader3 16GB 6GB free, PID 6479 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 5 4.8 4.9 5 5 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	4.28% Terrible	Read 17.1 Write 5.8 Mixed 9.3 SusWrite 5 11% 9.3 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 2 79% 1.67 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 2x8GB 7,869 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	MC Read 21.8 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 18.3 58% 20.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 21.5 SC Mixed 19.9 53% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 75.4 53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 550-120nc Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

System: HP 550-120nc

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	6x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1x

SSD
MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 73%, 5,673 samples	4x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	1x
MZ7TE128HMGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 58%, 2,337 samples	1x

RAM
M378B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 4,871 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $368

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363