Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X79-UD3  (all builds)
Memory20.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '17 at 22:24
Run Duration302 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 90.2
1-Core 111
2-Core 205
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 560
59% 470 Pts
64-Core 559
35% 559 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
AMD(1002 0B00) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 947 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Lighting 62.5
Reflection 56.6
Parallax 75
51% 64.7 fps
MRender 55.4
Gravity 50.6
Splatting 70
49% 58.6 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial_ CT1050MX30 1TB
601GB free
Firmware: M0C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 351
Write 184
Mixed 212
55% 249 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 24.7
96% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 95.8
DQ Mixed 53.3
60% 103 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 103%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
428GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
81.9% Excellent
Read 270
Write 260
Mixed 267
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 41.4
150% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 134
119% 177 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
355GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 529
Write 508
Mixed 522
116% 519 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 48.7
174% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 153
169% 287 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 122%
Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Series 500GB
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 490
Write 261
Mixed 275
75% 342 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 16.7
108% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 37.3
88% 188 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 89%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 146
Write 110
Mixed 117
93% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.17
82% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
404GB free
Firmware: CC34 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 72
Write 73.2
Mixed 66
53% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.42
91% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 70%
WD Elements 2TB
676GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 38
Write 35.5
Mixed 34.2
46% 35.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.39
4K Mixed 0.32
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 44%
Multiple Card Reader0 64GB
59GB free, PID 6479
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 31.1
Write 28.4
Mixed 29
38% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.19
4K Write 2.76
4K Mixed 1.52
165% 3.16 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C9 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
51% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 16.9
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 12.5
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X79-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,062 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3 - $380

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $577
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback