bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel NUC6i3SYB
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 20 '19 at 03:36
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100U
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 82.9
1-Core 72.9
2-Core 139
60% 98.3 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 200
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 57%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 535 Series 120GB-$75
57GB free
Firmware: RG21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 138 125 143 131 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 340
Write 181
Mixed 206
SusWrite 133
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 32.4
114% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 142
123% 182 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 87%
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$116
899GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN139B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 860 683 777 690 802 825 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1,371
Write 1,148
Mixed 1,058
SusWrite 773
244% 1,087 MB/s
4K Read 51.9
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 66.2
212% 69.7 MB/s
DQ Read 521
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 406
305% 413 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 187%
Great: 355%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB
1TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 11 7.2 6.6 4.4 6.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 61.3
Write 61.7
Mixed 39
SusWrite 6.1
53% 42 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 42%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB
931GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 92 96 93 97 98 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 106
Write 44
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 96
96% 75.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 42%
ST320005 42AS 2TB
591GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 6.4 3.9 4.3 2 3.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 58
Write 57.7
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 3.4
51% 40.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 40%
ST310005 28AS 1TB
931GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 92 95 91 96 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 103
Write 103
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 95.3
124% 92 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
72.7% Very good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 25
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 20
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback