Asus P8H67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics65% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H67  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '19 at 13:44
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BIH-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 93
1-Core 106
2-Core 211
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 442
52% 404 Pts
64-Core 521
32% 521 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Asus(1043 8518) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1623 MHz, MLim: 1952 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
65% Good
Lighting 80.9
Reflection 77
Parallax 62.6
66% 73.5 fps
MRender 82
Gravity 80.7
Splatting 71.3
63% 78 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 120GB-$89
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 121 113 112 102 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 209
Write 131
Mixed 126
SusWrite 114
32% 145 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 29.1
4K Mixed 18.1
63% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 19.3
DQ Write 43.6
DQ Mixed 23
20% 28.6 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 48%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$79
66GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 56 56 53 56 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 56.2
Write 51.3
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 55
34% 47.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
82% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB HMT451U6AFR8A-PB Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 Transcend TS512MLK64V6H 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.3% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 17.2
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 17.2
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67 Builds (Compare 990 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67 - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $427
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback