Asus P8H67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics91.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H67  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '20 at 11:19
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User BIH-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 94.4
1-Core 102
2-Core 203
78% 133 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 497
52% 418 Pts
64-Core 499
31% 499 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Zotac(19DA 2435) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.6% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 114
Parallax 91.2
94% 107 fps
MRender 92.7
Gravity 124
Splatting 101
86% 106 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 120GB-$89
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 125 123 120 116 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
37% Below average
Read 204
Write 130
Mixed 124
SusWrite 120
32% 145 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 29.6
4K Mixed 19
65% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 19.9
DQ Write 43.8
DQ Mixed 22.2
20% 28.6 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37%
Great: 48%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
84GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 220 215 206 207 203 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.4% Above average
Read 218
Write 203
Mixed 190
SusWrite 212
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 42.5
4K Mixed 32.5
106% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 37.7
DQ Write 76.1
DQ Mixed 48.5
39% 54.1 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 129%
WD WD2002FYPS-01U1B0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 04.01G01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 93 94 97 95 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 104
Write 99.3
Mixed 71
SusWrite 94.6
68% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
166% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB HMT451U6AFR8A-PB Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 Transcend TS512MLK64V6H 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.2% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 17.9
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.9
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 58.8
68% 58.8 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67 Builds (Compare 990 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67 - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $427
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback