Asus SABERTOOTH X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X79  (all builds)
Memory41.1 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140506
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 27 '19 at 22:10
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 86.7
1-Core 101
2-Core 203
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 483
52% 412 Pts
64-Core 485
30% 485 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
Gigabyte(1458 3527) 1GB
CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 17.6
Reflection 20.7
Parallax 15.8
14% 18 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 17.9
Splatting 20.7
17% 21.1 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 120GB-$160
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R112
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,918
Write 31.8
Mixed 63.5
278% 1,338 MB/s
4K Read 365
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 4.7
560% 124 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 81%
OCZ Vector 150 240GB-$246
33GB free
Firmware: 1.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 143 145 144 141 145 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 311
Write 142
Mixed 180
SusWrite 143
43% 194 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 37.8
4K Mixed 26.8
84% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 164
127% 176 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 110%
WD Black 1.5TB (2010)
3GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 71.3
Write 64.7
Mixed 57.2
48% 64.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 85%
WD Black 1.5TB (2010)
1.5TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 137 139 138 136 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 151
Write 133
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 137
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 85%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
19GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 36 36 37 35 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 46% Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
930GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 155 156 156 154 156 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 119
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 154
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM3X4GBA1600C9V4 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C1 CM3X4GBA1600C9V4 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C1 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C1 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C1 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 48GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.3% Excellent
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 30.4
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 12.5
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 70.7
56% 70.7 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH X79 Builds (Compare 1,819 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X79 - $335

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $812
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback