Asus SABERTOOTH X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X79  (all builds)
Memory38.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140506
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateSep 01 '19 at 02:42
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 100
2-Core 191
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 460
50% 397 Pts
64-Core 517
32% 517 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.8.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Lighting 72.2
Reflection 69.9
Parallax 100
59% 80.9 fps
MRender 70.6
Gravity 74.7
Splatting 56.7
54% 67.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 120GB-$160
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 22 23 23 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 50% Great: 81%
OCZ Vector 150 240GB-$246
34GB free
Firmware: 1.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 126 125 129 129 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 332
Write 151
Mixed 199
SusWrite 126
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 24.6
85% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 170
131% 181 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 110%
WD Black 1.5TB (2010)
267GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 127 69 99 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 139
Write 104
Mixed 98.9
SusWrite 110
84% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 85%
WD Black 1.5TB (2010)
1.5TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 138 133 138 138 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 144
Write 131
Mixed 79.6
SusWrite 136
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 85%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
1GB free
Firmware: CC54
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,855
Write 30.8
Mixed 57.5
941% 1,315 MB/s
4K Read 512
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2.3
21,590% 172 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 96%
WD WD60EZAZ-00ZGHB0 6TB
5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 175 174 180 180 178 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 101%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
29GB free, PID 0732
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 21 22 23 22 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 92
Write 22.6
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 21.8
44% 41.2 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 6.7
488% 8.77 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM3X4GBA1600C9V4 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C1 CM3X4GBA1600C9V4 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C1 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C1 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C1 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 48GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.1% Excellent
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 29.8
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.8
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH X79 Builds (Compare 1,819 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X79 - $335

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $812
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback