Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 125%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X299-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory57.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '19 at 07:56
Run Duration358 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$195
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Memory 83.8
1-Core 149
2-Core 298
95% 177 Pts
4-Core 597
8-Core 1,059
100% 828 Pts
64-Core 1,135
70% 1,135 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3887 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
132% Outstanding
Lighting 183
Reflection 168
Parallax 172
149% 174 fps
MRender 205
Gravity 152
Splatting 114
124% 157 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 132%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
510GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 891 509 509 485 509 511 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
260GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 569 486 485 482 476 481 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 2,461
Write 2,170
Mixed 1,323
SusWrite 496
359% 1,613 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 205
4K Mixed 62.7
247% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 582
DQ Write 1,406
DQ Mixed 669
603% 886 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 248%
Great: 393%
Samsung 830 Series 500GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 55 55 55 54 55 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 6,394
Write 55.8
Mixed 112
SusWrite 54.3
344% 1,654 MB/s
4K Read 863
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 7.1
1,318% 291 MB/s
Poor: 92% Great: 131%
Samsung 850 EVO 500GB
251GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 128 127 129 129 129 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 168
Write 144
Mixed 90
SusWrite 128
30% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
5% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 129%
WD WD5000AADS-56S9B1 1TB
606GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 113 114 113 113 112 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 118
Write 106
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 113
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
170% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 89%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$97
1.5TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 136 136 138 137 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 169
Write 132
Mixed 125
SusWrite 137
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 85%
ST500DM0 02-1BD142 500GB
466GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 9.3 22 22 20 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 27
Write 41.5
Mixed 20
SusWrite 16.5
36% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 46%
Hitachi HDP725032GLA360 320GB
298GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 33 22 21 20 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.7% Very poor
Read 38.7
Write 39.5
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 25.9
41% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 16%
WDC WD50 00AADS-00S9B0 500GB
306GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
8.76% Terrible
Read 25.2
Write 23.8
Mixed 25
SusWrite 0.2
24% 18.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.4
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.76%
Great: 27%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA100 1TB
552GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
8.76% Terrible
Read 25.5
Write 43
Mixed 23
SusWrite 0
31% 22.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.4
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.76%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D26BFSB.16FD BLS16G4D26BFSC.16FD BLS16G4D26BFSB.16FD BLS16G4D26BFSC.16FD 64GB
2800, 2800, 2800, 2800 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
126% Outstanding
MC Read 41.2
MC Write 69.1
MC Mixed 42.6
146% 51 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 11.6
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 126%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X299-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,115 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $795
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback