Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X299-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory54.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display5760 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 16 '20 at 20:16
Run Duration366 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$350
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 82.1
1-Core 156
2-Core 284
95% 174 Pts
4-Core 556
8-Core 1,091
98% 824 Pts
64-Core 1,570
97% 1,570 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 93%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.50
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.4% Below average
Lighting 40
Reflection 46.2
Parallax 37.5
33% 41.2 fps
MRender 57.1
Gravity 40
Splatting 52.2
41% 49.8 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
436GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 918 510 511 511 510 509 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
135GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1302 1222 721 729 627 611 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
285% Outstanding
Read 2,413
Write 2,180
Mixed 1,472
SusWrite 869
387% 1,733 MB/s
4K Read 59.9
4K Write 201
4K Mixed 86.8
308% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 536
DQ Write 1,246
DQ Mixed 607
544% 796 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 285%
Great: 393%
Samsung 830 Series 500GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 24 42 43 46 47 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 4,860
Write 56.7
Mixed 114
SusWrite 33.5
263% 1,266 MB/s
4K Read 797
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 7.1
1,219% 269 MB/s
Poor: 92% Great: 131%
Samsung 850 EVO 500GB
251GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 129 130 130 130 130 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 175
Write 148
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 130
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
5% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 129%
WD WD5000AADS-56S9B1 1TB
366GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 122 122 120 121 122 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 116
Write 113
Mixed 105
SusWrite 121
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 89%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
1.5TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 137 138 138 138 138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 140
Write 134
Mixed 111
SusWrite 138
97% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 85%
ST500DM0 02-1BD142 500GB
466GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 39.8
Write 39.5
Mixed 30
SusWrite 36.5
49% 36.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
67% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 46%
Hitachi HDP725032GLA360 320GB
298GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.5% Very poor
Read 39.7
Write 40.5
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 4.7
37% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 16%
Seagate Expansion 500GB
29GB free, PID 2320
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 66 64 66 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Read 70.5
Write 20
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 64.9
61% 48.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
46% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 41%
WDC WD50 00AADS-00S9B0 500GB
306GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0 0.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 36
Write 26.2
Mixed 29
SusWrite 0
28% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 27%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA100 1TB
182GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 39.8
Write 41.8
Mixed 36
SusWrite 42
55% 39.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D26BFSB.16FD BLS16G4D26BFSC.16FD BLS16G4D26BFSB.16FD BLS16G4D26BFSC.16FD 64GB
2800, 2800, 2800, 2800 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 60.7
MC Mixed 32.9
120% 41.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 10.7
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 105%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X299-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,079 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,287
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback