MSI Z170A GAMING M3 (MS-7978)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics96.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7978
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING M3 (MS-7978)  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '17 at 14:25
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 96.6
1-Core 137
2-Core 252
92% 162 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 594
64% 509 Pts
64-Core 652
40% 652 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2164 MHz, MLim: 2253 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 122
Parallax 117
100% 121 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 108
Splatting 109
89% 109 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 256GB-$117
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1225G Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 520
Write 376
Mixed 437
99% 444 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 43.2
169% 63.7 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 71.6
116% 222 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 109%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 133
Write 141
Mixed 134
103% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 2.66
4K Mixed 0.36
124% 1.28 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 109%
WDC WD20 EFRX-68EUZN0 2TB
505GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 120
Write 97.3
Mixed 81.8
122% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 2.24
4K Mixed 0.26
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 52%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA100 1TB
295GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 120
Write 127
Mixed 104
150% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.79
4K Mixed 0.2
70% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 51%
WDC WD20 EFRX-68EUZN0 2TB
98GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 143
Write 97.6
Mixed 94.3
134% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.22
77% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 25.5
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 28.2
SC Mixed 23.2
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 51.8
77% 51.8 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A GAMING M3 (MS-7978) Builds (Compare 2,339 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING M3 (MS-7978) - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $584
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback