Huananzhi X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive374% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardHuananzhi X79  (all builds)
Memory30.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '19 at 08:05
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
65.1% Good
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 186
68% 142 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 687
65% 522 Pts
64-Core 888
60% 888 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R7 240
Asus(1043 0541) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1495 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.9.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.7% Terrible
Lighting 29.5
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 37.7
8% 32.3 fps
MRender 27.5
Gravity 25.9
Splatting 32.7
8% 28.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.7%
Great: 7%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
NE-128 128GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0629A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 29 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
374% Outstanding
Read 4,166
Write 43.3
Mixed 87.1
SusWrite 38.1
225% 1,084 MB/s
4K Read 506
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 5.6
776% 172 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 374%
Great: 415%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$70
220GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 377 381 378 373 384 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 1,453
Write 1,631
Mixed 1,304
SusWrite 396
268% 1,196 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 50.4
178% 68.4 MB/s
DQ Read 704
DQ Write 483
DQ Mixed 662
476% 616 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 164%
Great: 285%
P3-1TB 1TB
210GB free
Firmware: T180731
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 314 314 318 321 357 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 452
Write 460
Mixed 394
SusWrite 325
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 80.4
4K Mixed 36.8
131% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 275
210% 284 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 109%
MT-256 256GB
223GB free
Firmware: T170810a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 455 442 354 311 341 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 473
Write 388
Mixed 385
SusWrite 393
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 57.1
4K Mixed 25.6
96% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 108
111% 175 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 96%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$19
84GB free
Firmware: AX001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 69 69 69 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 72.8
Write 66.6
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 68.7
43% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown KRE-D3U1600M/ KRE-D3U1600M/ KRE-D3U1600M/ 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
91.3% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 36.4
MC Mixed 33
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 11.5
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 68.3
58% 68.3 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 106%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 779 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $956
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback