Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory17.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190129
Uptime19.1 Days
Run DateOct 02 '19 at 19:53
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$179
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Memory 96.1
1-Core 148
2-Core 288
98% 178 Pts
4-Core 533
8-Core 891
87% 712 Pts
64-Core 1,182
73% 1,182 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$350
Asus(1043 85E5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 3152 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 195
Parallax 177
146% 184 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 183
Splatting 128
119% 146 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 130%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 416 410 423 405 390 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 491
Write 384
Mixed 290
SusWrite 409
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 63.9
4K Mixed 29.9
101% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 67.8
DQ Mixed 102
82% 117 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
138GB free
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 99 99 102 101 102 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.6% Average
Read 157
Write 138
Mixed 136
SusWrite 100
30% 133 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 28.6
101% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 113
84% 111 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 129%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 32TB
11TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 17 16 19 20 18 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 538
Write 14.2
Mixed 61
SusWrite 18.5
115% 158 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.1
686% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 160%
Great: 160%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 8TB
571GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 97 101 101 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 136
Write 136
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 98.9
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.3
223% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
MC Read 35
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 29.2
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 27.1
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 53.5
75% 53.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,709 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING - $309

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $1,057
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback