Asus X99-DELUXE II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 134%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics164% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE II  (all builds)
Memory57.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '22 at 21:20
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 82.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 184
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 774
72% 599 Pts
64-Core 1,140
71% 1,140 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$365
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
164% Outstanding
Lighting 224
Reflection 214
Parallax 249
182% 229 fps
MRender 273
Gravity 224
Splatting 165
174% 221 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 164%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 667 723 700 680 671 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,847
Write 1,177
Mixed 679
SusWrite 653
241% 1,089 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 93.7
4K Mixed 44.9
161% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 815
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 446
361% 524 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 188%
Great: 283%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$690
36GB free
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,915
Write 1,843
Mixed 927
346% 1,562 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 62.5
199% 71.5 MB/s
DQ Read 902
DQ Write 678
DQ Mixed 781
586% 787 MB/s
Poor: 162% Great: 354%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 32TB
25.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 11 10 10 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 31
Write 8.7
Mixed 18.9
SusWrite 10.2
13% 17.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
93% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 160%
WD easystore 264D 14TB
9TB free, PID 264d
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 42 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 42.1
Write 42.1
Mixed 40
SusWrite 42.3
57% 41.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 2.2
204% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB-$351
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 47.5
MC Write 50.3
MC Mixed 42.2
133% 46.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 17.3
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 116%
Great: 172%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE II Builds (Compare 872 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE II - $452

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $931
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback