Lenovo 90BG0022US

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 90BG0022US (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO Bantry CRB
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20141217
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Oct 16 '19 at 17:31
Run Duration	417 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	48%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka) 31,243 User benchmarks, average bench 42% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	46.9% Average	Memory 63.4 1-Core 61.8 2-Core 113 48% 79.3 Pts	4-Core 178 8-Core 175 24% 177 Pts	64-Core 172 11% 172 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 22,117 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 36A0) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.351.1007.0 Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	4.11% Terrible	Lighting 4.97 Reflection 6.46 Parallax 8.84 4% 6.76 fps	MRender 3.29 Gravity 7 Splatting 5.13 4% 5.14 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.11% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 857GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC61 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 174 161 186 204 204 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 204 Write 211 Mixed 97.6 SusWrite 177 126% 172 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 112%
Maxtor 6 L100P0 100GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 15GB free, PID 3100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 29 29 29 31 31 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	18.8% Very poor	Read 30 Write 29.8 Mixed 22.7 SusWrite 29.3 38% 28 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.4 104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 18.8% Great: 20%
SDHC Card 16GB 8,111 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 13GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 9.2 9.1 9.3 9.6 9.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	4.78% Terrible	Read 15.2 Write 8.2 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 9.2 12% 9.82 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 9% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.78% Great: 24%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 14GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 2.1 2 1.7 1.8 1.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	5.38% Terrible	Read 26.3 Write 4.5 Mixed 13.7 SusWrite 2 12% 11.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.7 42% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.38% Great: 23%
pny USB 2.0 FD 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 6.2 6.2 5.9 6.3 6.8 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	5.07% Terrible	Read 17.2 Write 8 Mixed 7.8 SusWrite 6.1 12% 9.77 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 20% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.07% Great: 6%
Sony Storage Media 4GB 607 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 4GB free, PID 0439 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 6.4 6.7 6.3 6.2 6.7 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	6.82% Terrible	Read 29.3 Write 7.8 Mixed 6 SusWrite 6.5 13% 12.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.82% Great: 10%
USB DISK 2.0 64GB 391 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 35GB free, PID 4100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 3.7 3.9 5.9 6.2 6.5 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	7.6% Terrible	Read 22.6 Write 9.8 Mixed 12.9 SusWrite 5 15% 12.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.9 72% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 7.6% Great: 8%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 8GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 7GB free, PID 0015 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 6.1 6.1 5.7 5.9 6.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	5.02% Terrible	Read 16.5 Write 8.6 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 6 12% 9.7 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 21% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.02% Great: 7%
SanDisk Cruzer Switch 16GB 3,032 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 14GB free, PID 5572 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.3 5.3 5.2 5.4 5.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	7.1% Terrible	Read 10.5 Write 1.8 Mixed 5 SusWrite 5.3 7% 5.65 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.6 107% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.1% Great: 12%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 0GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 19.4 Write 14.3 Mixed 15.7 20% 16.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 2.3 118% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 13%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 9,902 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 19.8 Write 16.7 Mixed 8.5 18% 15 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 6%
Sony Storage Media 4GB 607 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 2GB free, PID 0439 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 6.7 6.1 6 6.1 6.8 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	6.71% Terrible	Read 29 Write 9.5 Mixed 7 SusWrite 6.3 14% 12.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.71% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 1x8GB 7,106 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.3% Poor	MC Read 8.7 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 7.2 23% 7.9 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 7.2 18% 6.3 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 90BG0022US Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90BG0022US

CPU
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	16x
Athlon X4 880KAMD $105Bench 46%, 8,721 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	15x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	1x
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	1x

SSD
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	1x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	1x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	1x

RAM
HMT41GU6BFR8C-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 29%, 2,078 samples	5x
M378B1G73EB0-CK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 29%, 5,321 samples	3x
M378B5173QH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 13,591 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 31% - Below average

Total price: $20

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16