Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Toshiba Satellite C40D-A

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Toshiba Satellite C40D-A (all builds)
Motherboard	AMD Larne
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140206
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 22 '19 at 11:22
Run Duration	287 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-5000 APU 10,330 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	33.5% Below average	Memory 51.6 1-Core 23.4 2-Core 45.2 28% 40.1 Pts	4-Core 90.6 8-Core 91.2 12% 90.9 Pts	64-Core 91.3 6% 91.3 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330 8,573 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 FA56) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 26.20.13025.10004 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.57% Terrible	Lighting 1.73 Reflection 3.69 Parallax 2.31 1% 2.58 fps	MRender 2.38 Gravity 1.6 Splatting 2.7 2% 2.23 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.57% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 115GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 312 313 314 313 314 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Read 442 Write 397 Mixed 403 SusWrite 319 88% 390 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 44.7 4K Mixed 35.8 116% 37 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 152 114% 151 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 128%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 89GB free Firmware: AM003M SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 105 104 104 103 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	60.6% Good	Read 108 Write 103 Mixed 37.8 SusWrite 104 64% 88.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273EB0-YK0 M471B5273CH0-YK0 8GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.7% Very poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 6.2 17% 5.87 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 6.6 15% 5.33 GB/s	Latency 155 26% 155 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite C40D-A Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C40D-A

CPU
A4-5000 APUAMDBench 27%, 10,330 samples	10x
E1-1200 APUAMDBench 23%, 6,904 samples	3x
E2-1800 APU (2012 M.Za)AMDBench 25%, 3,595 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 8330AMDBench 2%, 8,573 samples	10x
Radeon HD 7310AMDBench 1%, 7,882 samples	3x
Radeon HD 7340AMDBench 1%, 3,203 samples	1x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	1x
240G 240GBBRBench 78%, 141 samples	1x
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,608 samples	3x
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 19,285 samples	2x
4KTF25664HZ-1G6E1 1x2GBMicronBench 17%, 1,163 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155	Nvidia RTX 4060 $299	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350