PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 97.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 46.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z68 Extreme4 (all builds) |
Memory | 19.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110825 |
Uptime | 0.6 Days |
Run Date | Oct 25 '19 at 13:07 |
Run Duration | 157 Seconds |
Run User | BEL-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
|
71.1%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
97.7%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 000F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 72 46 87 84 83 MB/s
|
46.9%
Average
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F3 2TB-$105
215GB free
Firmware: 1AN1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 60 60 60 60 60 MB/s
|
25.5%
Poor
|
|||
WD WD2000JD-00HBB0 200GB
80GB free
Firmware: 02.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 26 27 24 24 24 MB/s
|
||||
Kingston HyperX Savage USB 3.1 128GB-$80
98GB free, PID 16b3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 51 49 28 51 51 MB/s
|
43.6%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 9905403-431.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/8G 9905403-431.A00LF 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
|
50.3%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 70x |
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 49x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 21x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 22x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 18x |
HD 3000 (Desktop V2 1.35 GHz)Intel $15Bench 2%, 6,831 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $628 |