Asus P8H77-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H77-M  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '19 at 02:51
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 62.3
1-Core 92.2
2-Core 153
59% 103 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 357
49% 364 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 71%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
261GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 51 46 55 71 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
40% Average
Read 83.1
Write 84.4
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 56.4
47% 64.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
105% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5040ED58E9W1600 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.9% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.5
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H77-M Builds (Compare 942 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $454
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback