Today's hottest deals

Asus X75VCP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X75VCP  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X75VCP
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130226
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 24 '19 at 10:54
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 2020M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
46.5% Average
Memory 70.9
1-Core 66
2-Core 124
53% 86.9 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 125
17% 129 Pts
64-Core 127
8% 127 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 14C7) 2.5GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5069
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.71% Terrible
Lighting 1.73
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 1.31
1% 3.18 fps
MRender 3.57
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 3.48
2% 2.72 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.71%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S700 250GB-$46
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S070
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 64 38 17 42 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 377
Write 374
Mixed 373
SusWrite 46.1
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 49.6
4K Mixed 25.6
100% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 44.5
DQ Mixed 1
30% 77.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 98%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
366GB free
Firmware: GG2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 98 103 105 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 103
Write 99.2
Mixed 37.5
SusWrite 101
62% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 58%
ZTE USB Storage FFFE 16GB
14GB free, PID fff5
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 3.3 3.9 4.5 3 4.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
1.65% Terrible
Read 1.8
Write 1
Mixed 1.5
SusWrite 4
3% 2.08 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
14% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.65%
Great: 2%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida 8001 R538G1601S2S 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.3% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 13.4
38% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 12.6
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 99.3
40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X75VCP Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X75VCP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $53
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback