Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H67  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120510
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 29 '19 at 23:56
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$173
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 99.7
2-Core 194
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 474
50% 402 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
3.46% Terrible
Lighting 4.27
Reflection 4.96
Parallax 3.41
4% 4.21 fps
MRender 5.71
Gravity 4.27
Splatting 3.09
3% 4.36 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.46%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 161 172 183 166 160 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 359
Write 194
Mixed 158
SusWrite 168
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 37.7
4K Mixed 19.4
72% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 22.8
DQ Write 50
DQ Mixed 23.7
22% 32.2 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 76%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
820GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 111 107 110 113 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 101
Write 60.5
Mixed 60
SusWrite 110
61% 83 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 62%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
242GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 128 128 126 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 148
Write 151
Mixed 85
SusWrite 127
170% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 60%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
879GB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 5
3% 5 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
3% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 72%
ST310005 20AS 1TB
135GB free, PID 102a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 29
Write 26
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 28.4
35% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905458-026.A00LF 9905403-038.A00G 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.8% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 8.3
25% 8.77 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 9.4
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67 Builds (Compare 1,016 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67 - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback