Gateway FX6860

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGateway FX6860  (all builds)
MotherboardGateway FX6860
Memory6.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110419
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 02 '15 at 23:41
Run Duration486 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$191
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 85.5
2-Core 166
57% 126 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 435
44% 360 Pts
64-Core 478
30% 478 Pts
Poor: 54% Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-OEM
Sapphire(174B 5207) 1.2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4752
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 18.6
Reflection 28.3
Parallax 20.7
15% 22.5 fps
MRender 30.4
Gravity 14.6
Splatting 24.9
19% 23.3 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 240GB-$199
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 193
Write 157
Mixed 121
35% 157 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 12.8
80% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 37.9
63% 122 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 66%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
971GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 133
Write 122
Mixed 116
93% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.96
4K Mixed 0.23
88% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
756GB free
Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 149
Write 146
Mixed 133
107% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.11
4K Mixed 0.21
66% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
828GB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 165
Mixed 168
130% 173 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.28
88% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 101%
Great: 114%
ST320005 42AS 2TB
885GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 62.1
Write 46.2
Mixed 29.2
54% 45.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.18
41% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 41%
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB
799GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Read 87.9
Write 64.4
Mixed 32.5
71% 61.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 0.33
4K Mixed 0.23
20% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 52%
ST320005 42AS 2TB
793GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 86.2
Write 54.5
Mixed 31.5
65% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.02
4K Mixed 0.28
46% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 38%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB
481GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 87
Write 56.7
Mixed 18.9
60% 54.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.24
48% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 43%
ST2000DM 001-9YN164 2TB
429GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 93.1
Write 65.9
Mixed 26
70% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.08
4K Mixed 0.29
49% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 71%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB
417GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 118
Write 58.4
Mixed 14.5
65% 63.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.17
4K Mixed 0.18
48% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 68%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB
406GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.2% Below average
Read 105
Write 52.3
Mixed 32.5
68% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 0.19
46% 0.59 MB/s
ST950042 0AS 500GB
328GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 29.7
Write 24.5
Mixed 18.6
30% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.05
4K Write 0.19
4K Mixed 0.03
8% 0.09 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 17%
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB
288GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 51.2
Write 42.9
Mixed 13.9
42% 36 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 0.79
4K Mixed 0.45
44% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 52%
Typical FX6860 Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Gateway FX6860

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $276
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback