Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics46% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 20 '19 at 11:27
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$95
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 49
2-Core 137
54% 89.8 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 381
35% 295 Pts
64-Core 389
24% 389 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.1
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46% Average
Lighting 55
Reflection 60.9
Parallax 77.3
45% 64.4 fps
MRender 61.7
Gravity 64.9
Splatting 52.7
48% 59.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 78 19 78 75 16 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.5% Poor
Read 201
Write 96.8
Mixed 87.8
SusWrite 76.4
26% 116 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 18.3
4K Mixed 10
43% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 12.3
DQ Write 68
DQ Mixed 117
67% 65.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 100%
Kingston SUV400S37240G 240GB
84GB free
Firmware: 0C3J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 146 95 89 81 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 403
Write 382
Mixed 323
SusWrite 144
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 80.3
4K Mixed 32.6
124% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 155
128% 180 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 77%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$34
162GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 98 98 98 100 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 125
Write 138
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 96.9
72% 99 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C9D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/4G 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.8% Average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 12.4
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,085 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $570
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback