Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z170 Extreme7+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z170 Extreme7+  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '19 at 17:28
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 88%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$165
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 76.6
2-Core 195
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 589
58% 474 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3205) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28% Poor
Lighting 32.7
Reflection 35
Parallax 31.5
27% 33.1 fps
MRender 38.7
Gravity 39.5
Splatting 34.7
30% 37.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 28%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
278GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 199 200 202 199 201 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 361
Write 368
Mixed 323
SusWrite 199
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 54.6
4K Mixed 36
126% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 202
152% 204 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
138GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 200 201 205 206 205 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 357
Write 344
Mixed 349
SusWrite 203
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 39.2
116% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 201
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 133%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
302GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 45 46 48 48 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 76.7
Write 67
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 45.9
44% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 57%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$24
56GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 67 69 70 70 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 46.7
Write 45
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 68.4
37% 49.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 69%
D4-310 TerraMaster_DAS 1TB
475GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 56 57 57 56 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 79.5
Write 80.2
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 56
52% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39%
Great: 55%
Seagate ST3250823AS 250GB-$99
86GB free
Firmware: 3.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 29 33 32 32 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 26.2
Write 9.2
Mixed 16
SusWrite 30.4
15% 20.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
64% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 37%
D4-310 TerraMaster_DAS 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 104 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 113
Write 105
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 104
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 71%
D4-310 TerraMaster_DAS 500GB
93GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 56 57 57 56 55 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.6% Below average
Read 63.5
Write 64.5
Mixed 52
SusWrite 56.4
44% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 35%
WD My Book 1140 2TB
322GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 92 94 94 94 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 80.2
Write 82.8
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 92.5
110% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
92% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 4x8GB-$165
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 26
87% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 23.9
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 Extreme7+ Builds (Compare 193 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock Z170 Extreme7+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $483
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback