ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 55% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	70.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP Z620 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 158A
Memory	88.3 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140325
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 16 '16 at 16:07
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 0 884 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	68.1% Good	Memory 81.8 1-Core 78.9 2-Core 153 62% 105 Pts	4-Core 294 8-Core 518 49% 406 Pts	64-Core 1,416 88% 1,416 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 376.33 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	70.7% Very good	Lighting 76.7 Reflection 114 Parallax 118 62% 103 fps	MRender 102 Gravity 108 Splatting 107 87% 105 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 256GB 11,652 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: 040H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 27473 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 85 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 51 (AE) Unknown 100 100 45 (B5) Unknown 100 100 28596194248706 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 87 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	62.9% Good	Read 440 Write 270 Mixed 338 77% 349 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 62.8 4K Mixed 5.78 75% 30.4 MB/s	DQ Read 171 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 5.83 53% 123 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 69%
Hitachi HUA72201 1TB 225 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 931GB free Firmware: A3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 135 135 99 (03) Spinup time 122 122 25789661502 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 136 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 138 138 31 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 49624 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 98 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 223 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 223 (C2) HDA temperature 240 240 210454052889 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	70.6% Very good	Read 125 Write 121 Mixed 131 95% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 0.4 103% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 78%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT8GC72B4NB1NJ-CG 12x8GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 12 of 12 slots used 96GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	82.5% Excellent	MC Read 36 MC Write 32.8 MC Mixed 30.4 94% 33.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 7.2 25% 8.7 GB/s	Latency 77.3 52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,435 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	153x
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	152x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	131x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	174x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	113x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	96x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	72x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	68x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	61x

RAM
9965525-138.A00LF 12x8GBKingstonBench 111%, 25 samples	24x
18JDF1G72PZ-1G6E1 8x8GBMicronBench 98%, 24 samples	21x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback