Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	46.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$60 71,790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Memory 83.1 1-Core 89.2 2-Core 157 66% 110 Pts	4-Core 230 8-Core 231 31% 230 Pts	64-Core 229 14% 229 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT08B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 29 28 28 27 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	46.4% Average	Read 385 Write 39.8 Mixed 84.3 SusWrite 29.2 29% 135 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 41.7 4K Mixed 14.8 73% 25.9 MB/s	DQ Read 296 DQ Write 44.2 DQ Mixed 45.3 65% 128 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 73%
Crucial M500 240GB-$73 31,779 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 153GB free Firmware: MU05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 234 234 235 235 236 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.7% Above average	Read 231 Write 228 Mixed 216 SusWrite 235 51% 228 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 27 4K Mixed 18.6 62% 20.4 MB/s	DQ Read 207 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 143 124% 183 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT51264BA1339.M16F 3x4GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 3 of 4 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	48.6% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 15.5 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 15.4 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 75 53% 75 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	42x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	34x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	34x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $624