| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Dell Studio XPS 8100 |
| Motherboard | Dell Studio XPS 8100 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20100708 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 16 '20 at 16:56 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
68.1%
Good
|
64% 103 Pts
|
36% 280 Pts
|
22% 352 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
17.5%
Very poor
|
18% 19.5 fps
|
17% 21.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
655GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 215 224 224 225 225 MB/s
|
54.9%
Above average
|
50% 223 MB/s
|
75% 26.6 MB/s
|
142% 195 MB/s
|
|
WD WD1001FAES-60Z2A0 1TB
298GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 71 72 73 73 MB/s
|
50.2%
Above average
|
64% 86.2 MB/s
|
176% 1.3 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT451U7AFR8C-RD 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
39.3%
Below average
|
38% 13.1 GB/s
|
29% 10.2 GB/s
|
65% 61.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Studio XPS 8100 Builds (Compare 668 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Dell Studio XPS 8100
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 267x |
| Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 194x |
| Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 115x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 49x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 34x |
| Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples | 30x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 61% - Good | Total price: $488 |