Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3160 1,747 User benchmarks, average bench 28% ¯¯¯¯¯¯SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	32.5% Below average	Memory 50.6 1-Core 21.7 2-Core 43.9 27% 38.7 Pts	4-Core 84.9 8-Core 87.3 11% 86.1 Pts	64-Core 87.6 5% 87.6 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Zotac(19DA B273) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.79% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 2.85 Parallax 2.5 2% 2.38 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 1.77 Splatting 3.87 2% 2.85 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.79% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 117 114 115 116 115 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	Read 336 Write 162 Mixed 264 SusWrite 124 49% 221 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 42.2 4K Mixed 25.1 89% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 156 DQ Write 141 DQ Mixed 152 113% 150 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5603-012.A00G 2x4GB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.6% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 9.5 26% 9.23 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 4.4 11% 4 GB/s	Latency 158 25% 158 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3160IntelBench 28%, 1,747 samples	5x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	5x

SSD
SSDPR-CX300-120 120GBBench 68%, 1,185 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 60GBKingston $76Bench 48%, 24,219 samples	1x
MZ7TY128HDHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 86%, 673 samples	1x

RAM
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples	1x
EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 2x4GBElpidaBench 45%, 3,512 samples	1x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16