Today's hottest deals

Acer TravelMate B117-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 8%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer TravelMate B117-M  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Lepus_BA
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170316
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '21 at 08:33
Run Duration319 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3160
CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Memory 20.7
1-Core 22.2
2-Core 43.8
17% 28.9 Pts
4-Core 79
8-Core 83.5
11% 81.2 Pts
64-Core 82.7
5% 82.7 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Acer(1025 108C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.71% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 1
Parallax 2.9
0% 1.37 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 2.4
2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.71%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
328GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 54 60 61 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 73.1
Write 57.7
Mixed 28
SusWrite 57.5
39% 54.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
68% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HYNIX 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 6.2
21% 7.4 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 3.4
10% 3.43 GB/s
Latency 315
13% 315 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TravelMate B117-M Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TravelMate B117-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback