Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3550-$335 23,599 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	85.5% Excellent	Memory 94.3 1-Core 109 2-Core 224 82% 142 Pts	4-Core 443 8-Core 444 59% 443 Pts	64-Core 435 27% 435 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 3766) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Lighting 34.3 Reflection 25.6 Parallax 31.3 28% 30.4 fps	MRender 38 Gravity 32.5 Splatting 31.9 28% 34.1 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$265 8,527 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 396 418 428 426 427 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 487 Write 420 Mixed 380 SusWrite 416 96% 426 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 66 4K Mixed 40.8 135% 46.1 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 350 DQ Mixed 362 272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 135%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 75GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 383 390 386 384 380 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 482 Write 417 Mixed 350 SusWrite 387 92% 409 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 66 4K Mixed 42.5 139% 47.1 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 353 DQ Mixed 336 261% 359 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown B473C640 2x8GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	61.8% Good	MC Read 22.5 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 19.2 61% 21.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 18.8 51% 18 GB/s	Latency 59 68% 59 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 62%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	138x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	131x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	107x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $278