Gigabyte GA-Z270M-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z270M-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270M-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '20 at 07:44
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$228
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Memory 95.2
1-Core 140
2-Core 280
95% 172 Pts
4-Core 513
8-Core 771
80% 642 Pts
64-Core 766
47% 766 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 450.12
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Lighting 159
Reflection 152
Parallax 156
130% 156 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 133
Splatting 108
113% 143 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 119%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 362 364 366 366 363 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 368
Mixed 337
SusWrite 364
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 45
163% 62.5 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 196
176% 265 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 107%
Great: 103%
Plextor M3 128GB
57GB free
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 208 206 191 193 209 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 477
Write 212
Mixed 236
SusWrite 203
62% 282 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 87
4K Mixed 38.9
144% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 168
147% 221 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 87%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
191GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 467 468 459 433 428 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 465
Mixed 441
SusWrite 453
106% 469 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 63.7
209% 76.5 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 306
245% 345 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 130%
Great: 125%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
453GB free
Firmware: 0909
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 101 144 140 108 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 158
Write 141
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 111
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 26.6
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 29.1
79% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 56.5
71% 56.5 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 669 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270M-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $486
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $251WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback