Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 10107

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 11%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10107  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Remore CRB
Memory0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '20 at 20:49
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-1200 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Memory 44.3
1-Core 14.8
2-Core 30.7
22% 29.9 Pts
4-Core 33.9
8-Core 29.2
4% 31.6 Pts
64-Core 32.1
2% 32.1 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310
Legend(17AA 3668) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.0
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
0.7% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 2.08
Parallax 1.25
0% 1.33 fps
MRender 1.48
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 1.48
1% 1.21 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.7%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
356GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 18 25 27 24 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 41
Mixed 36
SusWrite 24.5
25% 33.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
87% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 88%
ST950032 5AS 500GB
153GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 21 22 23 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 18.5
Write 22
Mixed 13.8
SusWrite 22.1
26% 19.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
48% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMR5030ED58E8W1600 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.4% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 3.7
10% 3.57 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 0
4% 1.57 GB/s
Latency 183
22% 183 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback