Positivo POS-MIH61CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPositivo POS-MIH61CF  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo POS-MIH61CF
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110509
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateFeb 29 '20 at 19:14
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 188
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 358
48% 358 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Nvidia(10DE 11E6) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Lighting 15.5
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 14.4
13% 14.2 fps
MRender 6.29
Gravity 16.9
Splatting 18
12% 13.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
101GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 163 131 136 237 140 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.7% Below average
Read 193
Write 97.2
Mixed 100
SusWrite 169
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 24.3
4K Mixed 11.4
48% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 25.3
DQ Write 26.1
DQ Mixed 23.8
18% 25.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$30
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0002CE02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 44 44 51 44 35 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 74.9
Write 72.4
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 42.2
42% 56.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-034.A00LF 9905471-006.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
53.3% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.8
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical POS-MIH61CF Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo POS-MIH61CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback