Today's hottest deals

HP Notebook

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 13%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (95%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F6
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180730
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMar 01 '20 at 01:50
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User BRB-User
Background CPU 95%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-7110 APU (2015 M.Ca)
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Memory 23
1-Core 16.5
2-Core 13.3
13% 17.6 Pts
4-Core 45
8-Core 46.8
6% 45.9 Pts
64-Core 49.5
3% 49.5 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
HP(103C 82F6) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
1.35% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 2.77
Parallax 2.66
1% 2.34 fps
MRender 1.48
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 1.87
1% 1.75 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.35%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
287GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 62 65 74 73 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
25% Poor
Read 18.7
Write 52.1
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 68.2
34% 45.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
99% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10% Very poor
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 4.1
10% 3.53 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 2.8
6% 2.2 GB/s
Latency 299
13% 299 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 8,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback