Today's hottest deals

HP Z2 Tower G4 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z2 Tower G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8455
Memory21.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181003
Uptime21 Days
Run DateMar 10 '20 at 13:40
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User PAN-User
Background CPU 79%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2144G
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 88.7
2-Core 163
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 714
64% 540 Pts
64-Core 730
45% 730 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P1000
HP(103C 11BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.74
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Lighting 33.6
Reflection 22.6
Parallax 27.2
27% 27.8 fps
MRender 27
Gravity 29.7
Splatting 33.1
25% 30 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
823GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPH4
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 170
Mixed 60.8
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0707
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 92.7
Write 117
Mixed 90.7
75% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD Kingston KHX2666C16/8G M378A1K43CB2-CTD Kingston KHX2666C16/8G 32GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
78% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 25.1
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 20.4
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 78%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z2 Tower G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

System: HP Z2 Tower G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback