Today's hottest deals

Asrock B75 Pro3-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock B75 Pro3-M  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120321
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 16 '20 at 14:00
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 188
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 356
48% 361 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 85E7) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.2% Terrible
Lighting 4.93
Reflection 4.42
Parallax 4.88
4% 4.74 fps
MRender 6.48
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.17
4% 5.52 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.2%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
King SHARE SSD 120GB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 73 76 77 71 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 344
Write 275
Mixed 137
SusWrite 96.7
47% 213 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 16.9
4K Mixed 11.6
59% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 19.7
44% 89.4 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 65%
Hitachi HUA721075KLA330 750GB
699GB free
Firmware: GK8OAB0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 82 82 82 83 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 82.1
Write 82.6
Mixed 42
SusWrite 82.6
53% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLE4G3D1608DE1TX0. Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 859B BLE4G3D1608DE1TX0. Kingston HP698650-154-HYAG 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.9% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.7
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75 Pro3-M Builds (Compare 578 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B75 Pro3-M - $85

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback