Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$60 71,790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3220 CPU @ 3.30GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Memory 90.7 1-Core 88.6 2-Core 148 67% 109 Pts	4-Core 221 8-Core 217 29% 219 Pts	64-Core 216 13% 216 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Asus(1043 84F0) 2GB CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Lighting 18.6 Reflection 14.9 Parallax 16 15% 16.5 fps	MRender 22.3 Gravity 18.5 Splatting 15.6 15% 18.8 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF4500RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 88 6.3 13 27 33 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.1% Poor	Read 229 Write 128 Mixed 113 SusWrite 50.8 29% 130 MB/s	4K Read 10.9 4K Write 12.3 4K Mixed 8 33% 10.4 MB/s	DQ Read 19.2 DQ Write 17 DQ Mixed 21.2 15% 19.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$19 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 277GB free Firmware: KC48 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 123 128 128 128 128 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 8.8 Write 2 SusWrite 126 32% 45.4 MB/s	4K Read 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905474-043.A00LF 99U5474-026.A00LF 8GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.6% Poor	MC Read 9 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 8.1 25% 8.63 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 7.8 22% 7.57 GB/s	Latency 66.2 60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 35%

Sail boat

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	23x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	12x
PSD34G160081 2x4GBPatriotBench 48%, 2,742 samples	11x

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $518