Today's hottest deals

Sony VPCEL3S1E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemSony VPCEL3S1E  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '17 at 08:36
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-450 APU
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Memory 53.6
1-Core 19.1
2-Core 38.3
26% 37 Pts
4-Core 38.9
8-Core 37.3
5% 38.1 Pts
64-Core 30.9
2% 30.9 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320
Sony(104D 908D) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
1.06% Terrible
Lighting 1.23
Reflection 1.73
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.49 fps
MRender 1.62
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.78
1% 1.39 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.06%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fujitsu MJA2320BH G2 320GB
233GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00400018 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
35% Below average
Read 65.5
Write 56.2
Mixed 65.4
47% 62.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.15
4K Mixed 0.2
61% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 35%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-DJ-F 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1334 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 5
13% 4.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 3.6
8% 2.97 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VPCEL3S1E Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Sony VPCEL3S1E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback