Today's hottest deals

Samsung 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120316
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 30 '17 at 05:34
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2467M
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
47.9% Average
Memory 80.1
1-Core 40.3
2-Core 58.2
42% 59.5 Pts
4-Core 94.3
8-Core 94.1
13% 94.2 Pts
64-Core 104
6% 104 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0C7) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2462
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
0.73% Terrible
Lighting 0.77
Reflection 1.69
Parallax 1.12
1% 1.19 fps
MRender 1.14
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 1.52
1% 1.09 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.73%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
337GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 82.1
Write 88.5
Mixed 74.2
61% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.15
50% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 58%
Seagate Backup+ BK 500GB
237GB free, PID a013
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 67.7
Write 76.6
Mixed 43.7
79% 62.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 0.64
4K Mixed 0.22
31% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-DJ-F 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
28.6% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 8.9
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback